https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2525 2025-12-10T02:16:15Z 2025-12-10T02:16:15Z Roani, Alcione Roberto https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/6449 2023-04-06T16:43:59Z 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Motivação e responsabilidade na ética do discurso de Habermas Author: Roani, Alcione Roberto First advisor: Dutra, Delamar José Volpato Abstract: The objective of the text is to analyze the conception of motivation to act and that of responsibility in the actions inherent to Habermas' discourse ethics based on the challenges in relation to his modus operandi(reasoning and applicability). The task lies in identifying the elements of this co-relation (cooriginality) between the rules of discourse and the communicative rationality intrinsic in speech acts in the theory of communicative action and motivational mobiles for the wills agents and the respective responsibilities inherent to actions within the scope of discourse ethics. To meet the requirements of this hypothesis there are two important aspects: the first refers to the rescue of the characteristics of discourse ethics, revisiting Kant and the respective Hegelian objections, in order to outline the bases for the construction of discursive ethics adjusted with the re-reading of the objections. Formalism, universalism, deontologism and cognitivism as fundamental characteristics join proceduralism towards a second moment in which it intends demonstrate the effects of a pragmatic theory of communication in discourse ethics and the realization of the conditions of possibility of understanding. From the theory of speech acts and the logical rules of discursive in its different spheres, it is possible to arrive at the observation that a speech act is an action (and while utterances imply interactions) and in the communicative action the subjects act towards understanding (Verständigung) and the agreement (Einverständnis) as a normative function (since its rational motivation is generated by the strength of the best argument, the good reasons - Gründe). Discourse ethics operates on two levels in relation to issues related to motivation, obligation and responsibility to act: the first sphere conceived as rational/normative starts from the rules of discourse in the theory of communicative action and remains linked to the principles (D) and mainly the normativity of the principle (U); the second sphere is linked to a political base and to the lifeworld but which impacts on moral content, the notion of solidarity and justice, the conception of good and inter-subjective relationships. The second sphere starts with communicative freedom (kommunikative Freiheit) and communicative power (kommunikative Macht) as the basis for presenting content (solidarity and justice) linked to proceduralism and intersubjective relations. The challenge is to find the connection between the normative expectation of the universal validity of the standard and issues the good life that refer to the horizon of the world of life. It is necessary to identify at both levels whether it is possible to consider the motivational force as weak or sufficiently capable to motivate to act and to generate obligations and responsibilities It is necessary to identify at both levels whether it is possible to consider the motivational force as weak or sufficiently capable to motivate to act and to generate obligations and responsibilities. Publisher: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Type: Tese

2021-02-01T00:00:00Z Brondani, Clóvis https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3213 2019-10-08T13:41:37Z 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: A teoria política hobbesiana entre a convencionalidade e a ciência Author: Brondani, Clóvis Publisher: Universidade de São Paulo Type: Relatório de Pesquisa

2019-01-01T00:00:00Z Bozatski, Maurício Fernando https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2554 2019-03-11T11:38:32Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Por que a tecnologia importa? As possibilidades e as consequências das tecnologias nos contextos científico e social Author: Bozatski, Maurício Fernando First advisor: Barra, Eduardo Salles de Oliveira Abstract: This thesis seeks to elucidate, from the perspective of the philosophy of technology, what technologies are and how they enable scientific development and yet how they imply in the creation and perpetuation of social and existential structures. The method of investigation is based mainly on post-phenomenology and material hermeneutics, so that in the first moment it is demonstrated how Don Ihde describes the technology, as much for its multistability characteristic, as in the way the technologies condition the experience based on humantechnology relations. From this conception of technological development, it is sought to understand how technologies are the foundation of scientific development in such a way that science has always been technoscience. Finally, based on the same definitions of the phenomenon of technology together with existential human experience and scientific practices, it is evaluated how technological development has produced structures of domination and control that are the very milieuof the present civilized world. Publisher: Universidade Federal do Paraná Type: Tese

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z