DSpace Coleção:https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/25252023-09-28T02:36:17Z2023-09-28T02:36:17ZMotivação e responsabilidade na ética do discurso de HabermasRoani, Alcione Robertohttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/64492023-04-06T16:43:59Z2021-02-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: Motivação e responsabilidade na ética do discurso de Habermas
Autor(es): Roani, Alcione Roberto
Primeiro Orientador: Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
Abstract/Resumen: The objective of the text is to analyze the conception of motivation to act and that of
responsibility in the actions inherent to Habermas' discourse ethics based on the challenges in
relation to his modus operandi(reasoning and applicability). The task lies in identifying the
elements of this co-relation (cooriginality) between the rules of discourse and the
communicative rationality intrinsic in speech acts in the theory of communicative action and
motivational mobiles for the wills agents and the respective responsibilities inherent to actions
within the scope of discourse ethics. To meet the requirements of this hypothesis there are two
important aspects: the first refers to the rescue of the characteristics of discourse ethics,
revisiting Kant and the respective Hegelian objections, in order to outline the bases for the
construction of discursive ethics adjusted with the re-reading of the objections. Formalism,
universalism, deontologism and cognitivism as fundamental characteristics join proceduralism
towards a second moment in which it intends demonstrate the effects of a pragmatic theory of
communication in discourse ethics and the realization of the conditions of possibility of
understanding. From the theory of speech acts and the logical rules of discursive in its
different spheres, it is possible to arrive at the observation that a speech act is an action (and
while utterances imply interactions) and in the communicative action the subjects act towards
understanding (Verständigung) and the agreement (Einverständnis) as a normative function
(since its rational motivation is generated by the strength of the best argument, the good
reasons - Gründe). Discourse ethics operates on two levels in relation to issues related to
motivation, obligation and responsibility to act: the first sphere conceived as
rational/normative starts from the rules of discourse in the theory of communicative action
and remains linked to the principles (D) and mainly the normativity of the principle (U); the
second sphere is linked to a political base and to the lifeworld but which impacts on moral
content, the notion of solidarity and justice, the conception of good and inter-subjective
relationships. The second sphere starts with communicative freedom (kommunikative
Freiheit) and communicative power (kommunikative Macht) as the basis for presenting
content (solidarity and justice) linked to proceduralism and intersubjective relations. The
challenge is to find the connection between the normative expectation of the universal validity
of the standard and issues the good life that refer to the horizon of the world of life. It is
necessary to identify at both levels whether it is possible to consider the motivational force as
weak or sufficiently capable to motivate to act and to generate obligations and responsibilities
It is necessary to identify at both levels whether it is possible to consider the motivational
force as weak or sufficiently capable to motivate to act and to generate obligations and
responsibilities.
Instituição: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Tipo: Tese2021-02-01T00:00:00ZA teoria política hobbesiana entre a convencionalidade e a ciênciaBrondani, Clóvishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/32132019-10-08T13:41:37Z2019-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: A teoria política hobbesiana entre a convencionalidade e a ciência
Autor(es): Brondani, Clóvis
Instituição: Universidade de São Paulo
Tipo: Relatório de Pesquisa2019-01-01T00:00:00ZPor que a tecnologia importa? As possibilidades e as consequências das tecnologias nos contextos científico e socialBozatski, Maurício Fernandohttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/25542019-03-11T11:38:32Z2018-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: Por que a tecnologia importa? As possibilidades e as consequências das tecnologias nos contextos científico e social
Autor(es): Bozatski, Maurício Fernando
Primeiro Orientador: Barra, Eduardo Salles de Oliveira
Abstract/Resumen: This thesis seeks to elucidate, from the perspective of the philosophy of technology, what technologies are and how they enable scientific development and yet how they imply in the creation and perpetuation of social and existential structures. The method of investigation is based mainly on post-phenomenology and material hermeneutics, so that in the first moment it is demonstrated how Don Ihde describes the technology, as much for its multistability characteristic, as in the way the technologies condition the experience based on humantechnology relations. From this conception of technological development, it is sought to understand how technologies are the foundation of scientific development in such a way that science has always been technoscience. Finally, based on the same definitions of the phenomenon of technology together with existential human experience and scientific practices, it is evaluated how technological development has produced structures of domination and control that are the very milieuof the present civilized world.
Instituição: Universidade Federal do Paraná
Tipo: Tese2018-01-01T00:00:00Z