https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2930 2025-12-07T09:05:25Z https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3769 Title: Uma proposta de articulação teórico-metodológica entre os campos variacionista, funcionalista e dialógico para o tratamento de variação/mudança: reflexões a partir da expressão do futuro do presente Author: Bragança, Marcela Langa Lacerda First advisor: Görski, Edair Maria Abstract: The literature of variation and functionalism, particularly in North America, has been currently trending towards understanding: (i) stylistic variation, understood differently depending on the variationist phase taken as reference to investigate this variation type, and (ii) conditions of production and reception of actual language use. Thus, these two fields approach issues related to the study of textual/discursive genres - sometimes implicitly, at other times explicitly. Regarding variation or change phenomena in Brazilian Portuguese, the literature on the expression of simple future tense shows paths not yet investigated that also evoke topics of genre analysis approaches to some extent. Facing this double-phenomena scenario, we propose in this dissertation a theoretical-methodological reasoning between the variationist functionalist, and dialogical fields to compose a transdisciplinary approach to deal with variation and change phenomena. Such proposal intends to promote a new reading key that is broad enough to include precepts of the three theoretical fields, especially to examine the expression of simple future tense and similar phenomena. The research is based on literature about (i) this grammatical phenomenon from a functionalist standpoint; (ii) the functionalist field that guides literature on this phenomenon; (iii) variation field in which we need closer consideration on historical aspects of emergence and development, which entails three different epistemological phases, in prototypical terms; and (iv) the Bakhtinian field, regarding some of its main philosophical, theoretical, and methodological aspects.We weave dialogue between the fields from the review of this literature and the problematization of some of its topics, considering points that can be combined despite the specifics with which they are approached in each field. The following concepts of discussion guided this dialogue: (i) scientific doing; (ii) subject and cognition; (iii) language; (iv) the relationship between language, individuals, and society; (V) explanations on linguistic change. From the articulation between the fields, we thus propose a new approach designed in this thesis of Enunciative-discursive sociofunctionalism. Among the aspects that characterize this approach, the following stand out: (i) linguistic uses entries within the scope of social practices, with the knowledge that they constitute a stylistic and distinctive practice; (ii) the concept that ideology is at the center of language use practices; (iii) circumscription of language study to discourse genres; (iv) election of genre styles as an object of study; (v) a revision of forms/functions of variation/changephenomena from a perspective that integrates genre styles; (vi) view that linguistic change follows a path of experimentation of genres and styles; (vii) multidimensional and multilevel methodological design (top down style). In view of this new perspective, we indicate how some facets of the expression of simple future tense can still be examined, as well as glimpse the possibility (i) of potentializing the study of variation/change phenomena, when these are taken into account with particular social dynamics, through the choice of discourse genres as locus of linguistic variation (/stylistic) analysis, considering that the relationship between forms, functions, and social meaning of variation is set in this context, and (ii) of production of definitions for the role of social practices meaning for the actual uses of language and, reversely, their role in the constitution of the language. Publisher: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Type: Tese 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3720 Title: Vozes sociais na "não-pessoa": circulação dialógica no processo de letramento Author: Trombetta, Vanda Mari First advisor: Correa, Manoel Luiz Goncalves Abstract: That which comes in the third person, that about which one says / writes, when it is considered a product of authors / addressees interactions, brings, by referring to an already-said, brings a third element (a third voice) in the composition of discourse objects. This last, due to also constitute itself from an already-said, a social voice, expressa reply from the addresser, in accordance with the many several positions the different social experiences that the addresser, as the author, takes in interactions. To think discourse objects as social voices is, thus, to accept it as a product of addressers replies to addressees (BAKHTIN, [1979] 2010a 2006), which allows to think not only about the present interaction, but also as its constitutive element on possible utterances linked by addressers to social practices authors bring to bear on their texts. For doing this, by accepting the participation of a third in language production, we aim to describe it, as regards college entrance exam texts, in terms of voices that participate in college entrance exam texts and define them according to school practices authors have had or have (direct or indirect) access. The theoretical foundation sof dialogical analysis (BAKHTIN [1961-1962, 1975, 1979] 2010 a, b, c) and the CIRCLE), modern rhetoric (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005), literacy theories (STREET, 2012b, 2014), and the indiciary paradigm (GINZBURG, 1989), are taken as the works theoretical-methodological basis. Thus, phenomena are examined that mobilize the emergence of marks materialized in texts, phenomena at the same time linked to the specificities of the immediate enunciative situation, on the one side, and to what appear as elements stabilized in and by interactions throughout history, on the other. The corpus is composed by 264 FUVEST 2006 college entrance exam texts having work as their subject. Results obtained show that the construction of the discourse object work is a dialogue among three rigorously present interlocutors in these written productions: the addresser/author, addressees and some identifiable voices of the already-said, whose marks are summoned in discourse objects, constituting them and imposing themselves on them. Publisher: Universidade de São Paulo Type: Tese 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z