Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/4824
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor1Castro, Liérson Borges de-
dc.contributor.referee1Dalla Rosa, Clarissa-
dc.contributor.referee2Silva, Roberto Valmir da-
dc.creatorMocelin, Chaiane Mara-
dc.date2021-10-04-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-16T20:13:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-14-
dc.date.available2021-12-16T20:13:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/4824-
dc.description.abstractThis study is a literature review about the use of the macrophytes Alternanthera philoxeroides, Nymphoides indica and Salvinia auriculata in the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients from wastewater. Macrophytes were selected according to occurrence in the state of Rio Grande do Sul; nutrient removal efficiency, their biotype and the largest amount of study available. The methodology consists of a review of previously published studies on each macrophytes, in order to identify which is the best alternative for removing nutrients from aqueous effluents. The advantages and disadvantages present in the use of macrophytes are reported, such as the problem of free floating being dragged by the current and its advantage in the implementation of wetlands, in addition to the respective potential for use in the treatment of wastewater. The study found through bibliographical research that the macrophyte Salvinia auriculata obtained better results, when taking into account the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water column, with averanges from 61,2% e 69,0% respectively.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoO presente estudo trata de uma revisão bibliográfica a cerca do uso das macrófitas Alternanthera philoxeroides, Nymphoides indica e Salvinia auriculata na remoção dos nutrientes nitrogênio e fósforo de águas residuárias. As macrófitas foram selecionadas de acordo com fatores que consideraram: a ocorrência natural no estado do Rio Grande do Sul; a eficiência na remoção de nutrientes; o biótipo da planta e a maior quantia de estudos disponíveis. A metodologia adotada consistiu em uma revisão de estudos já publicados a respeito de cada uma das macrófitas separadamente, a fim de identificar qual se apresenta como a melhor alternativa para a remoção de nutrientes de efluentes aquosos. São relatadas as vantagens e desvantagens presentes na utilização das macrófitas como, por exemplo, a problemática da flutuante livre ser arrastada pela correnteza e sua vantagem na implantação das zonas húmidas, além dos respectivos potenciais de emprego no tratamento de águas residuárias. O estudo constatou que dentre as macrófitas pesquisadas, a Salvinia auriculata obteve os melhores resultados, com médias de 61,2% para o nitrogênio e 69,0% para o fósforo quando avaliada a remoção de nutrientes na coluna d’água.pt_BR
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Thiago Menezes Cairo (thiago.cairo@uffs.edu.br) on 2021-10-29T17:05:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MOCELIN.pdf: 3331194 bytes, checksum: 1fe17dbb66b5fbae1598339d5cc85be3 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Franciele Scaglioni da Cruz (franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br) on 2021-12-16T20:13:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MOCELIN.pdf: 3331194 bytes, checksum: 1fe17dbb66b5fbae1598339d5cc85be3 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-12-16T20:13:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MOCELIN.pdf: 3331194 bytes, checksum: 1fe17dbb66b5fbae1598339d5cc85be3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-10en
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sulpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentCampus Erechimpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFFSpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectefluentept_BR
dc.subjectmacrófitapt_BR
dc.subjectnutrientespt_BR
dc.subjecttratamentopt_BR
dc.titlePotencial emprego de macrófitas na remoção de nitrogênio e fósforo em águas residuárias no Rio Grande do Sulpt_BR
dc.typeMonografiapt_BR
Appears in Collections:Engenharia Ambiental

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MOCELIN.pdf3.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.